|
Escape from Exile
Phayul, 18. Januar 2007
by Gen Sherap
 Time
has come for us to return. Night follows day, and day follows night.
Exile, too, if meaningful, is followed by return. For the very goal
of going into exile is but to refill our water bags and restock our
armory so that we might return home to finish the fight with renewed
vigor.
But in the case of our exile, something else happened: we came, we
saw, we stayed.
It is understood that there was much wisdom behind our escape to
India in 1959 following the Chinese invasion. There was also much
wisdom behind our leadership’s farsighted plan to develop strong
institutions and establish stable communities in India and abroad in
order to prepare for the eventuality of a prolonged exile. It goes
without saying that today the exile Tibetan community is one of the
most successful refugee groups in the world.
The flip side of this success is that we have become blind to the
very reason we came into exile in the first place. Our communities
have grown roots in foreign lands, and our houses have grown tall
against foreign skies. The comforts of a privileged exile have made
us forget our brethren inside Tibet; in fact some of us have even
grown to cherish our position as default beneficiaries of the
Chinese occupation of Tibet. Thus we extended our stay in India,
Nepal, Europe and America, swinging like a pendulum between delusion
and despair – the delusion that Tibet would be free if we can
preserve enough culture and generate enough publicity, and the
despair that Tibet would never regain its sovereignty no matter what
we do. After fifty years of waiting, we are still here – essentially
waiting. Waiting for what?
Some are waiting for a free Tibet! Strange as this may sound, there
are many chest-thumping patriots in our community who routinely bang
the table and scream, “I will return to Tibet only when it becomes a
free country!” These people, in an attempt to sound patriotic, are
unwittingly displaying their selfishness by implying that Tibetans
inside Tibet should do all the work and pay the price for freedom,
and then at the dawn of victory the exiles will march in amidst pomp
and ceremony. If you are one of these people, you should be ashamed
to claim even a square inch of land in a future free Tibet!
Then there are those of us who believe that Tibet can be freed by
fighting from exile, that we need not be on the battleground to win
the battle. This line of thinking is dangerously flawed. A freedom
struggle cannot be outsourced. A movement that is outsourced quickly
loses its legitimacy and effectiveness: imagine what would have
happened if Gandhi’s Salt March to Dandi had taken place on the
sandy beaches of California! Sadly, the Tibetan freedom struggle
increasingly resembles a manufacturing company, except in this case
the jobs are being transferred from Tibet to India and the West.
This is partly due to the current lack of political space inside
Tibet and partly due to the global community’s enduring sympathy for
the Tibetan cause. But instead of working to increase political
space inside Tibet, we have so far chosen to bask in the warmth of
global sympathy while passively waiting for the miracle of a free
Tibet. Gandhi would find our Tibetan-style passive resistance quite
strange - very passive, hardly resistant!
The movement in exile and the accompanying global sympathy are of
course necessary and helpful, for they deny China the legitimacy and
global acceptance that it so desires. But the main role of an exile
movement is to provide a megaphone to the resistance inside, to
engage and bring in outside groups and countries as allies, and to
provide financial and moral resources to the resistance inside
Tibet. Without an organized resistance inside Tibet, an exile
movement has no foundation to stand upon. Any victory that we
accomplish in the battle for global public opinion merely serves to
blow fire at China without setting it aflame. Raising awareness
through films and talks,
visits to the parliaments of foreign countries, petitions and news
headlines, and storming of embassies are all effective and necessary
tactics, but they remain tragically incomplete unless there is
substantial mobilization inside Tibet strategically aimed at
removing the pillars that support China’s occupation. Hence there is
a crying need for a grassroots movement across the three provinces
of Tibet that will give the beleaguered masses the hope and the
means to wrest power from the hands of the oppressor.
Our brethren in Tibet are the ones who best understand China and its
weaknesses. They are the ones who have the practical ability to plan
and execute a nonviolent satyagraha movement that can sever the
limbs of China’s rule in Tibet. However, due to the sinister
infrastructure and ruthless methods China uses to silence dissent
and prevent rebellion – some of which put even the futuristic,
Orwellian tactics to shame – the potential leaders who are most
likely to organize such a movement inside Tibet end up either jailed
or killed. A favorite lament of many critics is that there are no
grassroots political leaders among Tibetans; on the contrary, there
are hundreds of thousands of them. Unfortunately, they are all in
jail or in exile. The Chinese government knows that exiling an
activist is as effective as imprisoning her or him; both diminish
the effectiveness and relevance of the activist to the movement
inside Tibet. This in part explains why China shows little
hesitation these days before releasing political prisoners so long
as they are put aboard a plane out of Tibet.
This,
then, is the reason why we must return. Every activist living in
exile is an activist absent in Tibet. Every Tibetan who crosses the
Himalayas to become a refugee deprives our brethren in Tibet of an
actual or potential leader. The hundred thousand Tibetans in exile
are in fact a hundred thousand Tibetan leaders missing from Tibet.
Exile Tibetans who return to Tibet can play a pivotal role both in
laying the socioeconomic foundation and in organizing the actual
resistance. In spite of all the shortcomings of the exile community,
there are many virtues that the exiles can contribute to the cause:
knowledge of similar nonviolent movements around the world,
familiarity with modern communication technology that will form the
bedrock of mobilization, and the vision of a future democratic
Tibet.
This is not to say that the homeland Tibetans lack these virtues;
rather this is to emphasize that exile Tibetans have yet to pay
their dues and now it is time for them to serve on the battleground,
whether by teaching at a school, or helping at a clinic, or
mentoring at an orphanage, or assisting the start-up of a local
business. In the beginning, our initiatives can – and often should –
be social and economic rather than overtly political. But these
tactics must fit into a long-term strategy of creating more and more
sociopolitical capital in Tibet, which will become the raw material
of political mobilization when the opportunity arises in the form of
a change or crisis in Beijing.
Some will cite China’s strict borders and visa restrictions as
insurmountable obstacles. But obstacles exist so they may be
overcome. Already many young Tibetans residing in the West have
entered Tibet with relative ease as tourists, students, or visitors.
Some even live there now. Whether we go as tourists or returnees,
more and more homeland Tibetans are expressing their belief that our
return can play a pivotal role in changing the course of our nation.
Let this be a call to all Tibetans, young and old, residing abroad
in India, China, Nepal, Europe and North America. Time has come for
us to return. Our armory is full and our water bags have been
refilled. Board a plane, ride a bus, cross a river, or climb a
mountain! Before time brings our memory to rust, let’s find our
escape from this exile.
(Bilderauswahl: Tenzin N. Emchi)
Gen Sherap is writing under a pseudonym for many reasons, some of
which are obvious and some of which are not.
|